Assessment Committees
Assessment Committee & Leadership Structure: Communicating, Sharing and Closing the Loop
Assessment begins with faculty as they design methods for assessing student learning. Programs and Department Assessment committees coordinate the process with reviews and evaluation of assessment plans and reports. This is followed by the Division Assessment Committees who then make the final approval of assessment plans and reports. The division committees along with the Assessment Faculty Fellows post results on the Assessment SharePoint site. These results and any concerns are communicated to the Office of Academic Affairs Assessment Committee and/or Academic Council who then report to the Sr. Vice President of Academic Affairs (College Cabinet). The Institutional Learning Goal (ILG) Committee that consists of faculty from across the college, reviews the Institutional Learning Goals and Outcomes as well as the General Education Outcomes every four years. The ILG Committee also is charged with developing and recommending college wide assessment measures. The Assessment Faculty Fellows coordinate the work of these assessment committees with the Academic Council, administrators in relevant college offices, and student success initiatives to insure that assessment data are integrated into the college’s practices for the continuous improvement of courses and programs, student learning, and student success.
Faculty Fellows:
- Adam Moskowitz, Ph.D., Social Sciences amoskowi@cscc.edu
- Scott Laslo, MS, CWI | CWE | WPQ1, Design, Construction & Trades, slaslo1@cscc.edu
- April Martin, Ph.D. Professor Nursing amartin134@cscc.edu
Assessment Committees
- OAA Assessment Committee
- ILG Committee
- Arts & Sciences Committee
- Health & Human Services Assessment Commitee; Business, Engineering and Technology/Information Systems Technology Assessment Committee
Arts & Sciences Committee
| Leadership | Department |
|---|---|
| CHAIR: Amy Ng | Social Sciences |
| ASSESSMENT FELLOW: Adam Moskowitz | Social Sciences |
| Member | Department |
| Brian Peebles | Biological and Physical Sciences: |
| Raquel Pina | Languages and Communication |
| Scott Millsap | Languages and Communication |
| John Nedel | Mathematics |
| Phil Maclean | Mathematics |
| Derek Zeigler | Psychology |
| Shauna Sowga | Social Sciences |
| Stephen Logan | English |
| Dea Boster | Humanities |
Health & Human Services/Business & Engineering Technologies/Information Systems Technology Assessment Committee
The division committee checks the department reports to insure that faculty in departments are closing the loop by addressing outcomes of benchmarks that failed the previous year. Additionally, division committees should compile, discuss and summarize problematic results, and budgetary and strategic planning requests from the departments/programs and forward them to the OAA Assessment committee.
Business and Engineering Technologies/Information Systems Technology Division Assessment Committee
|
Co-Chairperson |
Department |
|---|---|
| Steve Levin Assessment Committee Member |
Automotive Technologies |
| Brad Trimble | Accounting Technology |
| Member | Department |
| Henry Bawden | Art, Media & Design |
| Madeline Cardona-Lebron | Computer Science |
| William Highley | Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning |
| David Hessler | Aviation Maintenance Technology |
| Patricia Opong | Computer Science |
Health and Human Services Division Assessment Committee
|
Co-Chairperson |
Department |
|---|---|
| Angela Fry OAA Assessment Committee Member |
Human Services |
| Jon Packer | Criminal Justice Emergency Medical Services Technology |
| Member | Department |
| Don Laubenthal | Hospitality Management |
| Said Chaouki | Medical Imaging |
| Tara Rohr | Nursing |
| Tiffany Dowling | Massage Therapy |